Which of these is most likely a difference between a feasibility report and an internal proposal?

The distinction highlighted by the selected answer relates to the context and motivation behind the development of feasibility reports and internal proposals. Typically, the author of a feasibility report is usually conducting an analysis to evaluate the viability and potential success of a project before significant resources, including funding, are committed. Because these reports are often created in response to external directives or to aid decision-makers who ultimately bear the consequences of the project's success or failure, the author may have less personal stake in the outcomes.

Conversely, an internal proposal is generally written by someone who is proposing a specific idea or project within the organization they work for. This author usually has a vested interest in the success of their proposal, as it may directly impact their role, team, or department. They are often advocating for something they believe in strongly and may have more to lose if the proposal is not accepted.

The contrasting stakes between authors are crucial for understanding the purpose of each document. In a feasibility report, the analysis may be more objective and less biased because the author's primary goal is to inform rather than persuade. In contrast, an internal proposal tends to be more personal and persuasive, reflecting the author's interest in seeing their ideas implemented.